The fight for equality and justice is intensifying, and we are at the forefront of this battle! Recently, our voices have echoed across influential platforms, highlighting the contradictions in political leadership and the ongoing struggle for fundamental rights.

With 10 media features in top publications, we are courageously challenging the hypocrisy in political discourse, advocating for the rights of women, and pushing for true representation. These victories are not just ours—they are victories for democracy and the pursuit of freedom.

Featured Appearances 

Holly Jean Soto, LOLA’s Operations Director
The Never-Ending Myth of the “Rich Getting Richer”

The claim that “the rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer” fuels calls for heavy taxation on the wealthy. But in a new article for AIER (American Institute for Economic Research), LOLA’s Operations Director Holly Jean Soto challenges this narrative—exposing the flawed data and zero-sum fallacies behind misleading inequality claims.

While reports like Oxfam’s push for more government intervention, Soto argues that resentment-driven policies do more harm than good—and that real solutions come from expanding private-sector opportunities, not punishing success.

🔍 Why taxing the wealthy won’t fix inequality
🔍 How misguided policies can backfire on low-income earners
🔍 What the latest data (including new research from the Mercatus Center) reveals about economic mobility

If we want real solutions, we need to focus on opportunity, not redistribution.

Click Here for full article

Anne Dias, Regional Leader, LOLA Brazil
The Truth About Brazil’s Rumble Ban

Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has once again wielded unchecked power—this time ordering the shutdown of the video platform Rumble. In her latest article for Reason, LOLA Brazil Regional Leader Anne Dias breaks down how this ruling exposes a dangerous pattern of digital censorship and democratic erosion in the country.

Following previous bans on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram, Moraes justified his decision with the same vague legal claims, citing “threats to democracy” without clear judicial authority. This alarming move raises a critical question: Should a single minister have the unchecked power to silence entire platforms without public debate or legal limits?

🔍 How Moraes’ actions set a dangerous precedent for government control over online speech
🔍 Why banning platforms without due process threatens Brazil’s democratic institutions
🔍 The broader consequences of using “polarization” as an excuse for censorship

When free speech is restricted in the name of protecting democracy, who really benefits?

Read the full article here

Full List Of Global Media Mentions

Every contribution helps us empower women leaders, grow our chapters, and advance liberty worldwide.

🌍 Make a difference today!